The Japan Federation
of Bar Associations (JFBA) held a Seminar on International Legal
Technical Assistance on September 14 in Tokyo. The seminar reported
the JFBA’s experiences in providing international legal
technical assistance to bar associations in, Vietnam, Mongolia
and the Kingdom of Cambodia.
At the beginning of the seminar, Mr. Kimitoshi Yabuki explained
the purpose of this seminar, which was to share the experiences
of JFBA members who had been engaged in legal technical assistance
for Asian bar associations and attorneys as such assistance
has been crucial in establishing the rule of law throughout
the Asian region.
JFBA members who had been engaged in legal technical assistance
reported on their activities in each country. Mr. Shunji Miyake
reported on JFBA activities in the Kingdom of Cambodia which
mainly concerned seminars designed to train Cambodian lawyers
to be instructors in Cambodian civil law. Ms. Miha Isoi reported
on assistance in Mongolia in order to enhance the activities
of the Association of Mongolian Advocates, including the publication
of its journals and support in operating the Conciliation Center
established within the association. From Mr. Takayuki Ishinada,
we heard about the workshops conducted in Vietnam for the establishment
of a unified bar association in that country. Mr. Masanori Tanabe
reported on the training programme for Mongolian lawyers conducted
by the Aichi Bar Association as a part of its assistance for
the Association of Mongolian Advocates.
Following the reports, a panel discussion was held with the
above presenters acting as panelists and the meaning of assistance
to bar associations was discussed along with issues to be solved
in providing assistance, and objectives and perspectives for
the future. They actively exchanged their opinions and one panelist
mentioned that in the countries where lawyers had a lower status,
it was difficult for individual lawyers to challenge other authorities.
However, if their respective bar organizations were enhanced,
they would be able to more successfully represent individual
lawyers as counterparts to such authorities.
|