The Japan Federation
of Bar Associations (JFBA) undertook special training on client
identity verification and record-keeping on January 20, 2009,
in Tokyo.
At the beginning of the training, Mr. Yuichi Kaido, Vice-Chairperson
of the JFBA Committee on International Criminal Law Legislation,
reported on the JFBA’s activities and achievements in
blocking the establishment of a system which would require attorneys
to reveal information on their clients to the state (the so-called
“Gatekeeper System”). Mr. Kaido explained the JFBA
comment issued in November 2008 responding to the Mutual Evaluation
of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF)
(the FATF is an inter-governmental body of which 32 countries
and regions, and 2 international bodies are currently members).
“It is important for attorneys to continue to fulfill
our obligations to verify the identities of our clients and
keep records in order to avoid the reporting obligations of
suspicious transactions,” he said, emphasizing the importance
of demonstrating through actual practices that attorneys never
assist in the transfer of criminal proceeds.
Next, Mr. Tatsu Katayama, Director of the JFBA Office of International
Affairs, presented specific methods used to transfer criminal
proceeds and actual cases, from inside and outside of Japan,
in which attorneys got involved in the transfer of criminal
proceeds. In addition, Mr. Katayama provided an in-depth explanation,
using a risk-based approach, on what attorneys should keep in
mind to avoid being involved with such transfers and showed
specific risks in each country or region and the characteristics
of clients involved in illegal transfers.
Finally, Mr. Yukio Yamashita, Chief Secretary of the JFBA Committee
on International Criminal Law Legislation, explained the legislative
history behind the provisions intending to require attorneys
to report suspicious transactions to the state and that the
provisions were deleted from the Bill on the Prevention of the
Transfer of Proceeds from Crimes on condition that the JFBA
establish its Rules Regarding Client Identity Verification and
Record-Keeping. The JFBA Rules were established before the enactment
of the said Bill. He further explained the objective, structure,
and specific contents of the Rules.
It is imperative that every member strictly adhere to the Rules
so that the enactment of reporting obligations continues to
be prevented.
|